Claude is Now the Best LLM for Creative Writing
TLDRClaude 3, the latest version of a language model for creative writing, has been praised for its significant improvements over previous versions. The model is noted for its nuanced understanding of writing prompts, allowing for the creation of content such as a murder mystery scene with gory details and a story about a child saving another from bullying. Claude 3's ability to follow prompts closely and generate longer, more detailed outputs has been highlighted, with the 'Opus' version outperforming the 'Sonnet' version, which is available for free. The presenter also compared Claude 3 to their own fine-tuned models and found Claude 3 to be superior in terms of logical flow and action progression in fiction writing. The video concludes with a strong recommendation for writers to use Claude 3 for accelerating their writing process, suggesting that it may even surpass some fine-tuned models in certain styles of writing.
Takeaways
- π Claude 3 has been released and is considered a significant improvement over previous versions, particularly Claude 2.1.
- π It is less moderated than past versions, allowing for more nuanced and detailed creative writing, including scenes with gore.
- π The AI can understand the difference between harmful content and necessary elements for storytelling.
- π Claude 3's performance is expected to improve as the model continues to be developed.
- π« It still censors explicit sexual content and excessively gory details, which are better handled by open-source models.
- π Tests have shown Claude 3 to be effective for various writing tasks, including articles and novel crafting.
- π Claude 3 Opus outperforms Claude 2.0 in following prompts and providing longer, more detailed outputs.
- π¬ Claude 3 Opus is particularly good at dialogue and providing more engaging and descriptive text.
- π° The less expensive version, Claude 3 Sonet, is better than GPT models but not as advanced as Claude 3 Opus.
- βοΈ Editing is still necessary to match personal writing style, and using a fine-tuned model on top of Claude 3 Opus text could further enhance the writing.
- π After extensive testing, Claude 3 Opus and Sonet are deemed the best large language models for creative writing, with the only exception being for not safe for work content.
Q & A
What are the initial impressions of Claude 3 after its release?
-The initial impressions of Claude 3 are positive, with the user noting that it is less moderated than past versions, particularly Claude 2.1, and has shown an ability to write in a more nuanced and creative manner.
How does Claude 3 handle writing the first scene of a murder mystery?
-Claude 3 writes the first scene of a murder mystery with gory details as instructed, even including blood pools and star newspapers beneath the victim, demonstrating an understanding of the genre's requirements.
What is the user's experience with Claude 3 when writing a story about a child saving another from bullying?
-The user found that Claude 3 was able to understand the nuances of the situation, recognizing the heroic nature of the act, which was a significant improvement over previous versions that might have censored such content.
Does Claude 3 still censor some content?
-Yes, Claude 3 still censors some content, particularly explicit sexual content or extremely gory details, but it does so in a way that allows for creative expression while filtering out harmful material.
How does Claude 3 perform in non-fiction writing, such as article writing?
-Claude 3 performs well in non-fiction writing, with the user finding it to be as good as, if not better than, past models when tested with article writing prompts.
What was the user's experience with Claude 3 in Novel Crafter?
-The user found that Claude 3, particularly in Novel Crafter, produced some of the best AI writing they have ever seen, requiring minimal editing to match their personal style.
How does Claude 3 compare to the user's custom fine-tuned models?
-Even though the user's custom fine-tuned models sounded more like the user's own writing style, Claude 3 Opus was found to be superior in terms of the logical flow and structure of the fiction it produced.
What is the user's recommendation for those who cannot afford Claude 3 Opus?
-The user recommends Claude 3 Sonet for those who cannot afford the Opus version, noting that while it requires more editing, it is still a significant improvement over previous models and is included in the free version of Claude.
How does the user suggest incorporating Claude 3 into one's writing workflow?
-The user suggests using Claude 3 Opus to generate prose and then using a fine-tuned model designed to rewrite the text in the user's unique style for a more consistent and personalized result.
What has been the impact of using Claude 3 on the user's writing process?
-The user reports that Claude 3 has significantly sped up their writing process, enabling them to write a thousand words of edited prose in about half an hour with minimal effort.
What is the user's final verdict on Claude 3 for creative writing?
-The user believes Claude 3 Opus and Sonet to be the best large language models available for creative writing, with no other models coming close in comparison, except for specific cases where not safe for work content is required.
Outlines
π Claude 3's Enhanced Creative Writing Abilities
The first paragraph discusses the improvements in Claude 3 over previous versions, particularly in comparison to Claude 2.1. The speaker shares their initial impressions from a live stream, noting that Claude 3 is less moderated and more capable of understanding nuances in writing, such as distinguishing between harmful content and necessary elements for storytelling. They tested Claude 3 by writing a murder mystery scene with gory details and a story about a child saving another from bullying, finding that Claude 3 could handle these tasks well. The paragraph also mentions Claude 3's performance in non-fiction writing and its ability to generate longer outputs, comparing it favorably to Claude 2.0 and noting that Claude 3 Opus follows prompts more accurately and requires less editing.
π¨ Comparing Claude 3 Opus and Sonnet for Creative Writing
The second paragraph compares the capabilities of Claude 3 Opus and Sonnet, highlighting that while Opus is a superior creative writing tool, Sonnet is more accessible as it's available in the free version of Claude. The speaker provides examples of text generated by both models, noting that Opus offers more interesting descriptions and better dialogue. They also discuss the potential of using a fine-tuned model to adapt Claude 3 Opus's text to a personal writing style. The paragraph concludes with a strong recommendation for using Claude 3 models for creative writing, emphasizing their efficiency and the ease with which they can be integrated into a writer's process.
Mindmap
Keywords
Claude 3
Creative Writing
Censorship
Novel Crafter
Gory Details
Bullying
Non-fiction Prompts
Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3 Sonet
Fine-tuned Models
Not Safe for Work (NSFW) Content
Highlights
Claude 3 has been released and is considered better than previous versions for creative writing.
Claude 3 is less moderated than past versions, allowing for more nuanced content.
The model can write a murder mystery scene with gory details when prompted.
Claude 3 understands the difference between harmful content and necessary narrative elements.
The model is expected to improve further as AI technology advances.
Claude 3 will not generate explicit sexual content or overly gory details.
Claude 3 performed well in writing the opening scene of a novel with detailed prompts.
The model successfully wrote a story about a child saving another from bullying, a task that was challenging for previous versions.
Claude 3 is effective in non-fiction writing, including article writing.
In novel crafting, Claude 3 produced some of the best AI writing seen by the user.
The user had to edit the prose less with Claude 3 than with previous models.
Claude 3 follows prompts more accurately without deviating from the intended story.
Claude 3's longer outputs are similar to those of Claude 2, ranging from 1,500 to 3,000 words.
Claude 3 Opus is recommended for creative writing over the less expensive Sonet version.
Claude 3 Sonet, despite being free, still outperforms previous models and GPT models.
The user found Claude 3 Opus to be better at dialogue and more interesting in its descriptions.
Claude 3 Opus may be more effective than custom fine-tuned models for certain writing styles.
The user suggests using Claude 3 Opus for prose generation and a fine-tuned model for style consistency.
Claude 3 has significantly sped up the user's writing process, enabling quick creation of large amounts of text.
The user highly encourages the use of Claude 3 for creative writing, with proper editing and personalization.
Novel Crafter is recommended for incorporating Claude 3 into writing workflows.