Elon Musk to advertisers who are trying to ‘blackmail’ him: ‘Go f--- yourself’

Summary

In a candid interview, the speaker fiercely addresses the fallout from a controversial trip, countering the notion that it was an 'apology tour' and discussing the impact of an advertising boycott on their company. The speaker emphatically rejects any form of blackmail through advertising withdrawal, suggesting a potential shift away from advertising-dependent business models. Despite the criticism and threats from advertisers, the speaker remains defiant, challenging the assertion that their actions could lead to the company's downfall. Instead, they argue that if the company fails, it would be due to the advertising boycott, a scenario they seem prepared to confront with their substantial resources.

Takeaways

• 😮 The individual expresses strong opposition to being influenced or blackmailed by advertisers, using explicit language to emphasize their point.
• 🔥 There's a notable public perception of the individual's trip as part of an 'apology tour,' which they address and clarify in the discussion.
• 💬 The conversation involves high-profile figures, including a mention of Bob Iger, suggesting the discussion's relevance to significant business or industry matters.
• 🤨 The individual suggests a radical shift away from advertising as a revenue model, implying a critique of the current dependency on advertising dollars.
• 💡 There's an underlying theme of resilience against external pressures, particularly from advertisers, with a willingness to face the consequences of standing by one's statements or actions.
• 📝 The individual predicts that an advertising boycott could potentially kill the company, highlighting the serious impact of advertising relationships on business health.
• 🙄 They challenge the narrative that advertisers leaving would be responsible for the company's downfall, instead suggesting that the accountability would be documented and judged publicly.
• 📰 The discussion touches on the importance of trust and the platform's comfort level for users, indicating a recognition of user experience concerns amid advertiser issues.
• 💰 There's a mention of the individual's financial capability to sustain the company in the absence of advertising revenue, pointing to personal wealth as a buffer against business challenges.
• 🚫 The dialogue concludes with an open question about the future, reflecting on the broader implications of trust and advertiser boycotts on the company's survival and public perception.

Q & A

What was Musk's reaction to advertisers threatening to leave Twitter?

Musk had a strong negative reaction, using explicit language to tell advertisers to 'go f*** themselves' if they try to 'blackmail' him with advertising boycotts.