They’re Not Just Banning Gas Cars — They’re Banning Freedom

Summary

Counselor Lisa Robinson warns Canadians about the upcoming federal mandate that will phase out gas-powered cars in favor of electric vehicles (EVs) by 2035. She argues that the policy is harmful to average citizens, with EVs being too expensive, impractical, and unsafe. Robinson critiques the government for forcing infrastructure investments in EV chargers without proper demand, using taxpayers’ money to subsidize the wealthy. She also expresses concern about the environmental and ethical issues surrounding EVs, including child labor in mining and toxic waste from batteries. Robinson links the initiative to a broader agenda for increased surveillance and control, urging citizens to resist and stand up for their freedoms.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Canadian federal government plans to mandate that 20% of all new vehicles sold must be electric by January 2026, with a target of 100% by 2035.
• 😀 This transition is described as a ban on gas-powered cars, even though it's framed as a policy change to promote electric vehicles.
• 😀 The shift to electric vehicles (EVs) is criticized for being unaffordable, impractical, and unsafe for the average Canadian.
• 😀 Automakers will face fines of $20,000 for every gas car sold beyond the EV quotas unless they buy credits from electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla.
• 😀 The policy is criticized for enriching companies like Tesla while Canadian automakers are penalized.
• 😀 Pickering, Ontario, has passed a report to expand EV charging stations, despite current chargers being underused and losing money.
• 😀 The expansion of EV infrastructure is seen as corporate welfare benefiting the wealthy, as most Canadians cannot afford $70,000+ EVs.
• 😀 EVs are linked to serious safety concerns, such as fire risks, long burn times, and the difficulty of safely disposing of toxic batteries.
• 😀 The mining of materials for EV batteries often involves child labor and environmental destruction, contradicting claims of sustainability.
• 😀 The push for EVs is presented as part of a larger agenda to build digital infrastructure for surveillance and control, including tracking vehicle usage and movement.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that the broader agenda is not about environmental sustainability, but about enforcing compliance through control mechanisms like smart cities and digital IDs.

Q & A

What is the primary concern expressed by Councilor Lisa Robinson in the video?

Councilor Lisa Robinson is primarily concerned about the federal government's mandate to phase out gas-powered cars in favor of electric vehicles (EVs). She argues that this policy restricts freedom of choice, is financially burdensome, and has potential environmental and safety drawbacks.

What is the timeline for the federal government's EV mandate in Canada?

Starting in January 2026, the federal government will require automakers to ensure that 20% of all new vehicles sold are electric. By 2035, the goal is for 100% of new vehicles sold to be electric.

How does Councilor Lisa Robinson describe the impact of the EV mandate on consumers?

She claims that electric vehicles are unaffordable for most Canadians, impractical, and unsafe. She emphasizes that many people do not want EVs, yet the government is pushing this transition through mandates and penalties.

What does Councilor Robinson say about the financial implications of the EV policy on automakers?

Robinson explains that Canadian automakers will be fined $20,000 for every gas-powered car sold past the government-imposed quotas unless they buy credits from electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla, which she argues enriches wealthy companies at the expense of local carmakers.

What are the key criticisms of EV infrastructure expansion mentioned by Councilor Robinson?

Robinson criticizes the expansion of EV chargers in Pickering, noting that the existing chargers are underused, unprofitable, and unsustainable. Despite this, the government is funding more chargers at public facilities like fire halls and libraries, which she sees as wasteful and corporate welfare for the wealthy.

What safety concerns does Councilor Robinson raise about electric vehicles?

She highlights the fire risks associated with electric vehicles, stating that EVs burn hotter and longer, with a risk of reigniting days after the initial fire. She also points out that fire crews are not fully equipped to deal with these risks.

How does Councilor Robinson describe the environmental impact of EV batteries?

Robinson critiques the environmental impact of EV batteries, pointing out that lithium extraction involves child labor in the Congo and destroys ecosystems. She also mentions that less than 5% of batteries are recycled, with toxic chemicals leaching into the environment.

What does Councilor Robinson believe is the real agenda behind the push for electric vehicles?

Robinson believes the EV mandate is not about environmental protection but about establishing infrastructure for greater control over citizens' lives. She warns that the data from EV chargers could be used for surveillance in 'smart cities' with restricted movement and carbon tracking.

What is the relationship between Pickering and the broader global agenda mentioned by Councilor Robinson?

Councilor Robinson mentions that Pickering is part of a network called Icky, which she claims is connected to global organizations like the UN, the World Economic Forum, and Agenda 2030. She argues that local councils are bypassing democracy in favor of implementing global policies that restrict individual freedoms.

What call to action does Councilor Robinson make at the end of the video?

Councilor Robinson urges people to take action by contacting their municipal counselors, provincial MPPs, and federal MPs to oppose the EV mandate. She emphasizes the importance of speaking out through calls, emails, and public appearances to resist the federal overreach.