Otak Atik Amandemen UUD 1945

Summary

The transcript discusses a proposed amendment to the 1945 Indonesian Constitution regarding presidential term limits. Currently, presidents serve a maximum of two five-year terms. The proposal includes reviving the state guidelines (GBHN) and potentially eliminating direct presidential elections. Reactions vary among political parties, with some favoring longer terms and others advocating for a single extended term. The discussion highlights comparisons with other countries' presidential terms, outlines the legal requirements for constitutional amendments, and emphasizes that successful governance should prioritize citizens' welfare over the duration of leadership.

Takeaways

• 😀 The proposal to amend the Indonesian Constitution includes discussions on extending presidential term limits.
• 📜 Current regulations allow a president to serve for five years, with a possibility of re-election for one additional term, totaling a maximum of ten years.
• 🔄 There are suggestions to reintroduce the 'Garis Besar Haluan Negara' (GBHN), giving the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) authority over its drafting.
• 👥 Political parties have diverse opinions on the proposed amendments, with some supporting longer terms while others prefer maintaining the current limits.
• 🇺🇸 The U.S. has a two-term limit of four years each, contrasting with Indonesia's current rules.
• 🇵🇭 The Philippines allows presidents to serve a single six-year term, showcasing different approaches to leadership duration.
• 🇨🇳 In China, presidential term limits were abolished in 2018, enabling lifetime presidencies.
• ⚖️ For amendments to occur, proposals require at least one-third of MPR member support and must be clearly justified.
• 📊 A two-thirds presence of MPR members is necessary for the session, and a simple majority must approve any changes.
• ⏳ Historical amendments occurred between 1999 and 2002, limiting presidential power to ten years, emphasizing the need for checks on authority.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the transcript?

The main topic is the proposal to amend the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia regarding the extension of the presidential term.

What are the current rules regarding the presidential term according to the 1945 Constitution?

The current rules state that the president and vice president serve a term of five years and can be re-elected for one additional term, totaling a maximum of 10 years.

What are some of the proposals for amending the presidential term?

Proposals include reintroducing the State Guidelines (GBHN), which would allow the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) to choose the president, thus affecting future presidential elections.

What responses have political parties given regarding the proposed amendment?

Responses vary; some parties support a single presidential term of seven or eight years, while others believe the current two-term system is still ideal.

How do other countries' presidential term limits compare to Indonesia's?

In the United States, presidents can serve two four-year terms; in the Philippines, the president serves a single six-year term; and in China, there are no term limits as of 2018.

What are the conditions required for amending the 1945 Constitution?

Amendment requires a proposal from at least one-third of the MPR members, clear reasons for the change, attendance of at least two-thirds of the MPR members at the meeting, and approval from a minimum of 50% plus one of the members.

What historical amendments have occurred to the 1945 Constitution?

Significant amendments were made during the reform period from 1999 to 2002, which included limiting presidential power to 10 years and changes regarding regional autonomy and direct elections.

What are the arguments for extending the presidential term?

Proponents argue that extending the term could provide more time to achieve the country's development goals and fulfill the presidential vision and mission.

What concerns are raised about extending the presidential term?

Concerns include the potential for increased concentration of power and the need to ensure that changes reflect the interests of the people rather than specific groups.

What is the significance of the GBHN in the context of the proposed amendments?

Reintroducing the GBHN is significant as it would shift authority back to the MPR, which some see as a way to regain a form of centralized governance and influence over presidential selection.