Part 1 - How to Write the Review of Related Literature

Summary

In this video, Dr. Edward Padme discusses how to write the review of related literature and studies in a research paper. He explains the distinction between 'literature' (books, newspapers, magazines) and 'studies' (previous research), and outlines the four-step process for writing a literature review: Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation (SSAP). The focus is on reading relevant materials, combining ideas from the research and references, and synthesizing insights to build the foundation of the study. Dr. Padme emphasizes the importance of properly citing sources and connecting them to the research's objectives.

Takeaways

• 📘 The video focuses on how to write the 'Review of Related Literature and Studies' in a research paper.
• 📚 'Literature' includes textbooks, newspapers, magazines, journals, and manuals relevant to the research topic.
• 📖 'Studies' refer to previous research conducted that is related to the current research being written.
• 📝 The writing process is summarized into four stages: Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation (SSAP).
• 🔍 The first stage, 'Survey,' emphasizes reading extensively to establish the relevance of materials to the research.
• 🔗 The second stage, 'Synthesis,' involves combining the research’s objective with the ideas found in reference materials.
• 💡 In the 'Synthesis' stage, citations from references are followed by an inference explaining how the reference supports the research.
• 📜 Citation format typically includes the author's name, year, and the relevant idea from the reference.
• 🧐 'Synthesis' solidifies the foundation of the research by showing a clear connection between the reference and the research.
• 🎥 The video is part one, and viewers are encouraged to watch the next video for further guidance.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video?

The main topic of the video is how to write the review of related literature and studies in a research paper.

What does the speaker mean by 'literature' in the context of a review of related literature?

In the context of a review of related literature, 'literature' refers to sources like textbooks, newspapers, magazines, journals, and manuals that are relevant to the research being conducted.

How does the speaker define 'studies' in relation to literature?

'Studies' refer to previous research conducted by others that is relevant to the current research being done by the writer.

What is the acronym SSAP used for in the video?

SSAP stands for Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation, which are the key stages in writing the review of related literature and studies.

What is the first step in writing the review of related literature and studies?

The first step is 'Survey,' which involves reading various sources to determine their relevance to the research being conducted.

Why is it important to read multiple materials in the survey stage?

It is important to read multiple materials to establish whether they are genuinely related and relevant to the research, allowing for a thorough understanding of the topic.

What does the synthesis stage involve?

The synthesis stage involves combining two ideas: the objective of the research and the ideas from the reference materials, to establish their connection and relevance to the research.

At what point in the review process does writing begin, according to the video?

Writing begins during the synthesis stage, where the writer starts citing references and discussing the relevance of the ideas contained within the reference materials.

What pattern does the speaker suggest following when writing the review of related literature and studies?

The speaker suggests following a pattern of citation and synthesis, where the writer first cites the reference, then discusses the inference and relevance to their research.

What does the speaker suggest doing after citing a reference?

After citing a reference, the speaker suggests discussing the inference or new idea that arises from the reference, establishing its relevance to the research.