Rechtsanwältin Katja Wörmer Interview mit Journalistin Kerstin Heusinger

Summary

The transcript details the 29th day of the Reiner F. trial, focusing on the unusual proceedings and the testimony of ROG Bittel, a well-known reporter. Bittel, who has known Reiner F. for a long time, discusses the lack of opportunity for Reiner to address allegations in his own format, being cut off from his Telegram channels and unable to respond to accusations on his own terms. The summary also touches on the complexities of the legal situation, including the societal and financial aspects of the case, the involvement of various parties, and the challenges in proving allegations of misconduct.

Takeaways

• 😀 The transcript discusses the 29th day of the trial involving Reiner F., with a focus on the unusual and varied events of the trial.
• 😐 The 6th of September was a significant date in the trial, with discussions about the defendant's access to media and his ability to respond to allegations.
• 📅 The trial has been marked by irregularities, including the defendant's temporary lack of access to his Telegram channels and his removal from the corona committee by Viviane Fischer.
• 🗣️ ROG Bittel, a well-known reporter, was invited as a witness due to his extensive knowledge of the case and his reporting on the trial.
• 🚫 Reiner F. was initially denied the opportunity to respond to allegations on camera, which was a point of contention in the trial.
• 💬 There were discussions about financial irregularities and the defendant's attempts to repay loans, which were central to the case.
• 🏛️ The trial highlighted the complexities of the legal situation, including the defendant's status as a non-lawyer and the challenges in understanding the corporate legal structure involved.
• 💼 The script mentions the involvement of various legal figures, including lawyers and mediators, in the trial's proceedings.
• 📝 There were concerns about the admissibility of evidence, with discussions about the importance of oral testimony and the challenges of correcting written statements after the fact.
• 🔍 The trial is expected to continue, with further witness testimonies and evidence expected to be presented in upcoming sessions.

Q & A

What is the significance of the 29th process day in the Reiner F. case?

The 29th process day marks a significant day in the Reiner F. case, where various proceedings and testimonies take place, including the examination of witnesses and the discussion of evidence.

Who is ROG Bittel, and what is his role in the Reiner F. case?

ROG Bittel is a well-known figure who has been reporting on the Reiner F. case, including live broadcasts. He has been involved in the case since the corona committee days and has been a key figure in reporting the proceedings.

Why was Reiner F. unable to respond to accusations in his own format?

Reiner F. was unable to respond to accusations in his own format because he was technically disconnected from his Telegram channels and was not given the opportunity to speak on camera before the accusations were aired.

What happened on the 21st of September in the context of the Reiner F. case?

On the 21st of September, Reiner F. was given the opportunity to address the accusations comprehensively for the first time during a show with ROG Bittel, which lasted nearly two hours.

What is the issue with the loan repayments discussed in the script?

The issue revolves around the repayment of loans taken by Reiner F. and Viviane Fischer, with discussions about whether the loans were used privately or for the corona committee, and the subsequent attempts to repay these loans.

Why was the witness hearing of the two witnesses from the previous week significant?

The witness hearing was significant because it provided an opportunity to clarify the legal and financial intricacies of the case, including the nature of the loans and the intentions behind their repayment.

What is the role of the legal counsel Künemann in the Reiner F. case?

Legal counsel Künemann is involved in the case, providing legal advice and representation. His testimony and written submissions have been crucial in addressing the societal and legal aspects of the case.

What is the controversy surrounding the society's legal form in the Reiner F. case?

The controversy involves whether the society in question was officially established and if it had the legal capacity to enter into contracts or hold accounts, which is central to the accusations of misappropriation.

Why was the written statement from Künemann considered unusual in the context of the trial?

The written statement from Künemann was considered unusual because it contained corrections to his previous oral testimony, which is atypical as the oral testimony is generally given more weight in legal proceedings.

What is the significance of the mündlichkeitsgrundsatz in the Reiner F. case?

The mündlichkeitsgrundsatz, or the principle of oral testimony, is significant as it emphasizes the importance of what a witness says during oral examination in court, rather than subsequent written statements.

What is the next step in the Reiner F. case as mentioned in the script?

The next step in the Reiner F. case is the continuation of the trial on the upcoming Wednesday, where further witness examinations and evidence presentations are expected to take place.