ESCÂNDALO O VAR DO FLAMENGO X PALMEIRAS NÃO CHAMAR PRA ENTRADA DO VEIGA NO TORNOZELO DO PULGAR!

PILHADO ESPORTES

31 Jul 202408:37

Summary

TLDRIn a heated rant, the speaker criticizes Brazilian referee Braulio for failing to call a VAR check on a serious foul by Palmeiras' Veiga against Flamengo's Pulgar. The speaker claims this decision significantly affected the game's outcome and highlights systemic issues in Brazilian football officiating, including the lack of accountability for referees. The discussion emphasizes that while players are punished for mistakes, referees often escape consequences, calling the overall situation a disgrace to the sport. The speaker also promotes a betting site and an upcoming post-game discussion on YouTube.

Takeaways

😡 The speaker criticizes Braulio, the referee, for his poor performance, especially against Flamengo.
⚽ A significant error involved a foul by Veiga on Pulgar, which was not reviewed by VAR.
🟥 The speaker believes Veiga should have been expelled for the foul, which could have impacted the game significantly.
📢 There is frustration that referees are not punished for their mistakes, unlike players who are penalized for errors.
📹 The speaker frequently discusses bad refereeing, not just in matches involving Flamengo.
🗣️ He mentions that after the game, there will be a discussion on the YouTube channel 'Canelada' by Jovem Pan Esports.
🏆 The speaker criticizes the CBF (Brazilian Football Confederation) and calls its refereeing a disgrace.
🤔 He questions why Braulio continues to officiate important matches despite repeated mistakes.
🚩 The speaker emphasizes that the VAR should have called for a review of Veiga's foul on Pulgar.
🎙️ He plans to continue discussing the controversial refereeing decisions in future broadcasts and online.

Q & A

What is the main complaint of the speaker about the referee Bráulio?
-The speaker complains that referee Bráulio frequently makes errors, especially against Flamengo, and failed to call a VAR check for a foul by Veiga, which could have significantly impacted the game.
Why does the speaker believe the lack of a VAR check for Veiga's foul was significant?
-The speaker believes the foul was strong enough to potentially injure Pulgar and that calling a VAR check could have resulted in Veiga's expulsion, giving Flamengo a significant advantage.
How does the speaker view the general state of Brazilian refereeing?
-The speaker considers Brazilian refereeing, and the CBF (Brazilian Football Confederation), to be very poor and frequently criticizes it for its low quality and frequent mistakes.
What specific error does the speaker attribute to Bráulio in the game discussed?
-The specific error attributed to Bráulio is not calling a VAR check for Veiga's foul on Pulgar, which the speaker views as a serious mistake.
What does the speaker suggest is the impact of Veiga's potential expulsion on the game?
-The speaker suggests that if Veiga had been expelled, Flamengo would have played with an extra player and Palmeiras would have lost one of its key players, significantly altering the game dynamics.
How does the speaker respond to accusations of bias (clubismo) in their comments?
-The speaker acknowledges that some might see their comments as biased but insists they regularly criticize refereeing mistakes, regardless of the teams involved, and stand by their opinions.
What does the speaker predict about the consequences for referee Bráulio after the game?
-The speaker predicts that Bráulio will face no consequences for his errors and will continue to officiate important games despite his mistakes.
How does the speaker describe the reaction of Flamengo's staff and players to the refereeing decisions?
-The speaker describes Flamengo's staff and players as being very upset and desperate, with the entire team seeing the foul but the referee and VAR ignoring it.
What action does the speaker plan to take following the game regarding the refereeing?
-The speaker plans to heavily criticize and discuss the refereeing errors in their post-game show 'Canelada' on YouTube and the radio, aiming to highlight the perceived injustices.
What promotional content does the speaker include in their message?
-The speaker promotes a betting site partnership, offering a 100% bonus on deposits up to R$200, and encourages viewers to join their post-game show on YouTube and the radio for more discussions.

Outlines

00:00

⚽ Criticism of Referee Bráulio and VAR Decisions

The speaker vehemently criticizes referee Bráulio for his frequent errors, especially against Flamengo. He highlights a specific incident where Bráulio, with the help of VAR, failed to call a foul by Veiga on Pulgar, which could have significantly impacted the game by potentially removing Veiga, one of Palmeiras' key players. The speaker condemns the overall quality of Brazilian referees and the governing body CBF, expressing frustration that referees are not held accountable for their mistakes.

05:01

😠 Unfair Treatment and Continued Criticism

The speaker continues to express his indignation over the lack of punishment for referees' mistakes compared to players, predicting that Bráulio will face no consequences for his errors. He emphasizes the significant disadvantage Flamengo faced due to Veiga not being expelled, which would have altered the match and the subsequent leg. The speaker calls on viewers to join the post-game discussion on YouTube and promotes a betting partnership with a special bonus offer.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Braulio

Braulio is the referee being criticized in the script. The speaker considers Braulio a 'horroroso' (terrible) referee who frequently makes mistakes, especially against Flamengo. The script details several errors attributed to him during a specific match, highlighting the speaker's dissatisfaction with his performance.

💡VAR

VAR (Video Assistant Referee) is a system used in football to review decisions made by the head referee. The speaker argues that the VAR should have intervened in a particular incident involving a foul by Veiga, criticizing its failure to do so as an example of poor officiating. The term 'vargonha' (a portmanteau of VAR and vergonha, meaning shame) is used to emphasize this point.

💡Veiga

Rafael Veiga is a key player for Palmeiras, mentioned in the script as committing a foul that should have warranted a VAR review. The speaker argues that his foul on Pulgar was serious enough to deserve a red card, which would have significantly impacted the game by giving Flamengo an advantage.

💡Flamengo

Flamengo is one of the football teams involved in the match discussed in the script. The speaker is a Flamengo supporter, expressing frustration over perceived biased refereeing against their team. The script highlights how the refereeing decisions, particularly the non-review of Veiga's foul, adversely affected Flamengo.

💡CBF

CBF (Confederação Brasileira de Futebol) is the governing body for football in Brazil. The speaker criticizes the CBF for its poor management of refereeing standards, calling it 'a vergonha do futebol brasileiro' (the shame of Brazilian football). This criticism is part of a broader complaint about the quality of refereeing in Brazilian football.

💡Pulgar

Pulgar is the Flamengo player fouled by Veiga in the incident discussed. The speaker describes how Pulgar's ankle was twisted due to Veiga's strong tackle, which they believe should have led to a VAR review and a red card for Veiga. This incident is central to the speaker's argument about poor refereeing.

💡Clubismo

Clubismo refers to biased support for one's own football club. The speaker acknowledges that some may accuse them of clubismo when criticizing refereeing decisions. However, they argue that their criticism is valid and based on observable mistakes, not just support for Flamengo.

💡Arbitragem

Arbitragem means refereeing. The script heavily criticizes the quality of refereeing in Brazilian football, describing it as 'um lixo' (garbage). The speaker believes that refereeing errors, like the one involving Veiga and Pulgar, significantly impact the outcomes of matches and are not adequately addressed by the CBF.

💡Punido

Punido means punished. The speaker discusses how players are punished for their mistakes, but referees like Braulio are not held accountable for their errors. This lack of accountability is a major point of contention in the script, highlighting a perceived double standard in football officiating.

💡Canelada

Canelada is a post-match commentary show mentioned in the script. The speaker invites viewers to watch Canelada on YouTube and Jovem Pan radio for more in-depth analysis and criticism of the refereeing decisions made during the match. This show serves as a platform for the speaker to further express their views.

Highlights

Senor criticizes referee Braulio for frequently making errors against Flamengo, emphasizing his poor performance.

Controversy arises as VAR fails to check a foul by Veiga, described as a dangerous tackle that twisted Pulgar's ankle.

The speaker accuses Brazilian football referees and CBF of being subpar and repeatedly ruining matches.

Discussion about accusations of bias, with the speaker addressing claims of club favoritism while asserting that the focus is on referee mistakes.

The incident where Veiga's strong challenge could have led to a game-changing expulsion is highlighted as a significant refereeing oversight.

The failure to call VAR in the incident is described as scandalous, with emphasis on how it affected the game's outcome.

Speaker argues that referees are rarely punished for mistakes, unlike players who face immediate repercussions.

Analysis of the first half, with Flamengo being seen as disadvantaged due to refereeing decisions.

Emphasis on how missing the call could have impacted the Copa do Brasil match, with Palmeiras potentially gaining an unfair advantage.

The narrative criticizes the CBF for not taking action against referee Braulio, accusing them of negligence.

Tension during the match is noted, with Flamengo's bench visibly frustrated and urging VAR intervention.

Referee Braulio is labeled as incompetent, with speculation about his frequent assignments to important matches due to alleged connections.

Announcement of the post-match analysis show 'Canelada,' promising an in-depth discussion on refereeing errors.

Promotion for the betting platform 'ApostaGanha,' offering bonuses as part of a sponsorship deal.

The speaker expresses confidence in Flamengo's performance despite the refereeing issues, praising players like Gerson.