ESCÂNDALO O VAR DO FLAMENGO X PALMEIRAS NÃO CHAMAR PRA ENTRADA DO VEIGA NO TORNOZELO DO PULGAR!

Summary

In a heated rant, the speaker criticizes Brazilian referee Braulio for failing to call a VAR check on a serious foul by Palmeiras' Veiga against Flamengo's Pulgar. The speaker claims this decision significantly affected the game's outcome and highlights systemic issues in Brazilian football officiating, including the lack of accountability for referees. The discussion emphasizes that while players are punished for mistakes, referees often escape consequences, calling the overall situation a disgrace to the sport. The speaker also promotes a betting site and an upcoming post-game discussion on YouTube.

Takeaways

• 😡 The speaker criticizes Braulio, the referee, for his poor performance, especially against Flamengo.
• ⚽ A significant error involved a foul by Veiga on Pulgar, which was not reviewed by VAR.
• 🟥 The speaker believes Veiga should have been expelled for the foul, which could have impacted the game significantly.
• 📢 There is frustration that referees are not punished for their mistakes, unlike players who are penalized for errors.
• 📹 The speaker frequently discusses bad refereeing, not just in matches involving Flamengo.
• 🗣️ He mentions that after the game, there will be a discussion on the YouTube channel 'Canelada' by Jovem Pan Esports.
• 🏆 The speaker criticizes the CBF (Brazilian Football Confederation) and calls its refereeing a disgrace.
• 🤔 He questions why Braulio continues to officiate important matches despite repeated mistakes.
• 🚩 The speaker emphasizes that the VAR should have called for a review of Veiga's foul on Pulgar.
• 🎙️ He plans to continue discussing the controversial refereeing decisions in future broadcasts and online.

Q & A

What is the main complaint of the speaker about the referee Bráulio?

The speaker complains that referee Bráulio frequently makes errors, especially against Flamengo, and failed to call a VAR check for a foul by Veiga, which could have significantly impacted the game.

Why does the speaker believe the lack of a VAR check for Veiga's foul was significant?

The speaker believes the foul was strong enough to potentially injure Pulgar and that calling a VAR check could have resulted in Veiga's expulsion, giving Flamengo a significant advantage.

How does the speaker view the general state of Brazilian refereeing?

The speaker considers Brazilian refereeing, and the CBF (Brazilian Football Confederation), to be very poor and frequently criticizes it for its low quality and frequent mistakes.

What specific error does the speaker attribute to Bráulio in the game discussed?

The specific error attributed to Bráulio is not calling a VAR check for Veiga's foul on Pulgar, which the speaker views as a serious mistake.

What does the speaker suggest is the impact of Veiga's potential expulsion on the game?

The speaker suggests that if Veiga had been expelled, Flamengo would have played with an extra player and Palmeiras would have lost one of its key players, significantly altering the game dynamics.

How does the speaker respond to accusations of bias (clubismo) in their comments?

The speaker acknowledges that some might see their comments as biased but insists they regularly criticize refereeing mistakes, regardless of the teams involved, and stand by their opinions.

What does the speaker predict about the consequences for referee Bráulio after the game?

The speaker predicts that Bráulio will face no consequences for his errors and will continue to officiate important games despite his mistakes.

How does the speaker describe the reaction of Flamengo's staff and players to the refereeing decisions?

The speaker describes Flamengo's staff and players as being very upset and desperate, with the entire team seeing the foul but the referee and VAR ignoring it.

What action does the speaker plan to take following the game regarding the refereeing?

The speaker plans to heavily criticize and discuss the refereeing errors in their post-game show 'Canelada' on YouTube and the radio, aiming to highlight the perceived injustices.

What promotional content does the speaker include in their message?

The speaker promotes a betting site partnership, offering a 100% bonus on deposits up to R$200, and encourages viewers to join their post-game show on YouTube and the radio for more discussions.