👉AULA ABERTA: Como Evitar Jurisprudência Falsa no ChatGPT!

Summary

This video tutorial guides users on how to effectively use AI tools like ChatGPT for drafting legal documents, particularly in labor law. It highlights four strategies to avoid incorrect or fabricated jurisprudence, including instructing AI not to use jurisprudence, leveraging AI search features, using specialized tools like Perplexity, and manually sourcing jurisprudence. The video stresses the importance of studying jurisprudence to stay updated and provides practical tips on using AI to generate accurate legal documents while ensuring proper legal sourcing.

Takeaways

• 😀 AI tools like ChatGPT can assist in drafting legal documents, but caution must be exercised to avoid the generation of inaccurate jurisprudence.
• 😀 Clearly specify in AI prompts that jurisprudence should not be invented or included, ensuring the AI focuses on the document creation process.
• 😀 Using AI search functions, such as those in ChatGPT, ensures that generated content includes sourced and reliable jurisprudence.
• 😀 Platforms like Perplexity can help find accurate and trustworthy jurisprudence, ensuring the AI isn't fabricating case law.
• 😀 It is advisable to manually research jurisprudence, especially in specialized areas like labor law, to guarantee the accuracy and relevance of the legal content.
• 😀 The speaker recommends using tools like the Falcão jurisprudence database for Brazilian labor law research, which offers detailed case law and precedents.
• 😀 When manually sourcing jurisprudence, copy the relevant legal text and provide it to the AI for document creation, maintaining accuracy in the process.
• 😀 Four strategies to avoid AI-generated incorrect jurisprudence include setting specific AI commands, using reliable search tools, leveraging Perplexity, and conducting personal jurisprudence research.
• 😀 Staying updated on jurisprudence is essential for legal professionals, especially through tools and databases that track legal changes and precedents.
• 😀 The speaker's preferred method for legal document creation involves sourcing jurisprudence personally and then using AI to draft the legal document based on the research.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the speaker in this video?

The main focus of the speaker is on how to effectively use artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, to assist in drafting legal documents, particularly in the area of labor law, while ensuring that the AI does not generate fabricated legal precedents or jurisprudence.

Why is it important to ensure that AI does not generate fake jurisprudence?

It is important because fabricated jurisprudence can undermine the reliability and accuracy of legal documents. Using incorrect or non-existent legal precedents could result in significant legal errors, making the document legally invalid or unreliable.

What are the four methods proposed by the speaker to prevent ChatGPT from inventing jurisprudence?

The four methods are: 1) Explicitly instruct ChatGPT not to use or generate jurisprudence in the prompt. 2) Use ChatGPT's built-in search feature that provides sources along with the generated content. 3) Use an external AI tool like Perplexity that offers search results with sources. 4) Manually search for jurisprudence, study it, and then ask ChatGPT to create content based on verified sources.

What is the role of studying jurisprudence in legal work, according to the speaker?

Studying jurisprudence is vital as it helps lawyers stay updated on the latest legal developments and precedents. It is emphasized as the best way to ensure legal accuracy and stay informed, which ultimately enhances legal expertise and document quality.

What is the advantage of using Perplexity in legal research, as mentioned in the video?

Perplexity is an AI tool that helps users find verified legal precedents by providing the sources along with the results. This ensures that the jurisprudence used is not fabricated, giving users confidence that the information is accurate and reliable.

How does the speaker suggest using Falcão in legal research?

The speaker recommends using Falcão, a legal research tool, to find relevant jurisprudence. It allows users to search for decisions across various labor courts and select specific tribunals for more focused results. The speaker highlights its usefulness over other tools like JusBrasil for labor law research.

What is the importance of manually researching jurisprudence before using AI to create legal documents?

Manually researching jurisprudence ensures that the legal precedents used are accurate and relevant to the case at hand. By studying jurisprudence first, lawyers can guide AI tools to generate content that is well-founded in actual legal principles, thus maintaining the quality and credibility of the legal document.

How does the speaker recommend integrating AI with human legal expertise?

The speaker suggests a hybrid approach where AI tools like ChatGPT are used to draft legal documents based on accurate, human-researched jurisprudence. This ensures the document is legally sound while benefiting from the efficiency and speed of AI in drafting.

What example does the speaker give for searching jurisprudence on Falcão?

The speaker gives an example where they search for jurisprudence related to 'adicional de transferência' (transfer allowance) and filter results by a specific labor court, such as TRT15. This allows for targeted legal research and ensures the use of relevant, accurate precedents.

What is the key takeaway regarding using AI for legal document creation?

The key takeaway is that AI can be a powerful tool for creating legal documents, but it is essential to ensure the accuracy of the legal precedents used. This can be achieved by either directly instructing the AI to avoid inventing jurisprudence or by conducting thorough manual research before inputting the data into the AI.