Tratamento de Realeza não tem sentido nenhum

Summary

This review dissects a Netflix movie featuring Isabela, a New York hairdresser who gets entangled with a prince from a distant kingdom. The reviewer humorously critiques the film’s lack of coherence, implausible decisions, and inconsistent character motivations. Key flaws include unrealistic plot points, such as Isabela leaving $2,000 in a salon globe and the prince's sudden affection despite barely knowing her. Cultural and language inconsistencies add confusion, while the romantic resolution feels rushed and unearned. The overall tone is critical, pointing out that the film fails to deliver any meaningful message or logic, making it a chaotic, illogical watch.

Takeaways

• 😀 Isabela, the main character, is a well-meaning yet financially irresponsible hairdresser from New York.
• 😀 The plot involves Isabela's chance encounter with Prince Thomas, who is engaged but gets involved with her for political reasons.
• 😀 The movie's narrative is filled with logical inconsistencies, such as Isabela hiding over $2,000 in a globe on her salon counter.
• 😀 Isabela's salon catches fire due to faulty electrical wiring, but she still continues to turn on lights in a clearly unsafe building.
• 😀 The film's humor feels forced, with characters engaging in bizarre and awkward interactions, such as asking how much a client is willing to pay for a service.
• 😀 The film portrays an unrealistic view of poverty in New York, with Isabela discovering a 'poor' neighborhood that seems to be full of happy people for no clear reason.
• 😀 Despite the prince’s initial self-absorbed demeanor, he eventually starts helping Isabela with charity work, further complicating the film’s message.
• 😀 Isabela and Prince Thomas's relationship develops in a rushed manner, with them falling in love after only two weeks.
• 😀 The prince abandons his arranged marriage to be with Isabela, as he doesn't want to live a lonely life like his driver, Walter, who regrets giving up his past love.
• 😀 The film's conclusion is predictable, with Isabela deciding to pursue a life helping others while the prince follows her, ultimately resulting in a clichéd romantic ending.
• 😀 The movie is criticized for its lack of coherence, unrealistic character decisions, and an overall nonsensical plot that leaves viewers questioning the narrative choices.

Q & A

Why does the reviewer criticize the character Isabela for keeping her savings in a globe at the salon?

The reviewer finds it illogical and unrealistic that Isabela keeps over $2,000 in a globe on the counter of a salon without any security measures, especially in a city like New York. The review points out that this is not only irresponsible but also highly improbable in real life.

What is the significance of Isabela's question about how much the prince is willing to pay for the haircut?

Isabela’s question about how much the prince is willing to pay is seen as a poor negotiation tactic. The reviewer humorously criticizes this approach, as it places the onus on the client to decide the price, which is unprofessional and unrealistic in a real-world context.

How does the reviewer describe the portrayal of the prince's behavior?

The reviewer describes the prince as a rich, entitled figure who initially comes off as arrogant and disconnected from the common people. However, his actions, such as giving Isabela a lavish room and donating furniture, are seen as misguided attempts to demonstrate humility, which only add to the film's absurdity.

What is the inconsistency regarding the prince’s sudden willingness to help in the poor neighborhood?

The inconsistency lies in the sudden shift of the prince's character from a self-absorbed figure to someone who actively helps the poor. The reviewer questions how he could have gone from being out of touch to generously donating, pointing out that this abrupt change feels forced and lacks genuine development.

How does the reviewer feel about the relationship between Isabela and the prince?

The reviewer is critical of the romantic relationship between Isabela and the prince, pointing out that it develops far too quickly and unrealistically. They mention that the couple falls in love after only two weeks, which is seen as rushed and unconvincing, making the relationship feel superficial.

Why is the reviewer frustrated with the financial decisions in the film?

The reviewer is frustrated by the characters’ poor financial decisions, such as the lack of fire insurance for a salon full of electrical equipment and the impracticality of Isabela storing her savings in an unsecured location. These decisions highlight a lack of financial responsibility and logic in the film.

What role does the prince’s wedding play in the plot?

The prince’s wedding is portrayed as a political arrangement rather than a love match, which adds to the film's absurdity. His reluctance to marry the woman he is engaged to, despite the political necessity, creates conflict and drives much of the plot, including his growing feelings for Isabela.

What is the significance of the scene where Isabela and the prince visit a poor neighborhood?

The scene is meant to highlight Isabela's discovery of the disparity between rich and poor neighborhoods, but the reviewer finds it absurd. The people in the poor neighborhood are inexplicably happy, dancing and celebrating without a clear reason, which feels unrealistic and exaggerated.

What does the reviewer think about the ending of the film?

The reviewer finds the ending unsatisfactory and strange, especially the final scene where Isabela and the prince ride off together. The romantic conclusion, after only two weeks of knowing each other, lacks believability, and the reviewer highlights how the ending seems forced and out of place.

Why does the reviewer think the film lacks coherence?

The reviewer argues that the film is incoherent due to its numerous implausible events, illogical character decisions, and absurd plot points. The various inconsistencies, such as the prince's sudden generosity and the lack of realistic development, contribute to the film’s overall lack of coherence.