킹제임스성경 유일주의자들의 엉터리 가르침1
Summary
TLDRThe speaker critically examines the King James Version of the Bible, specifically pointing out discrepancies in Acts 8:37. They argue that this verse is absent in many ancient manuscripts and was possibly added by the scribe's oversight. The speaker also discusses how this verse's inclusion was justified by Erasmus, despite its absence in significant texts. They conclude by questioning the credibility of those who claim the Bible is corrupted by Satan, suggesting that people are being misled.
Takeaways
- 📖 The speaker is discussing a specific verse in the Bible, particularly focusing on 37th verse of a chapter.
- 👤 There is a claim that the King James Version of the Bible has been tampered with by Satan.
- 🔍 The speaker refers to Kim Ju's paper, which analyzes the authenticity of certain verses in the New Testament.
- 📝 The paper identifies 13 verses that are not present in the original manuscripts and were added later.
- 🗣️ The speaker emphasizes that these verses are not found in significant ancient manuscripts.
- 🎭 The speaker points out that the style of writing in the disputed verses does not match the style of the apostles, like Peter or Paul.
- ✍️ The speaker suggests that the disputed verse in Acts 8:37 is not in the original text but was likely added by a scribe.
- 📜 The speaker mentions that the verse is not found in important manuscripts like MS 2 and MS 4, which were used by Erasmus to compile the New Testament.
- 🚫 The speaker concludes that the verse is not present in any significant manuscripts and was likely added by Erasmus arbitrarily.
- ❗ The speaker warns against blindly following teachings that claim the King James Version is corrupted without verifying the source.
Q & A
What is the main concern raised in the transcript about the King James Version of the Bible?
-The transcript suggests that the King James Version of the Bible has been corrupted by Satan and contains verses that are not part of the original text.
What specific verse is mentioned as an example of a verse that might not be original?
-Acts 8:37 is mentioned as an example of a verse that is not found in some ancient manuscripts and is suspected to be a later addition.
Who is Kim Ju-kwan and what is his stance on the King James Version?
-Kim Ju-kwan is a professor whose research is mentioned in the transcript. He argues that certain verses in the King James Version, including Acts 8:37, are not found in the original texts and are likely additions.
What is the significance of the term 'MS 2' mentioned in the transcript?
-MS 2 refers to a medieval manuscript that Erasmus used to create the New Testament. The absence of a certain verse in this manuscript suggests that it might not be original.
Why is Acts 8:37 considered to be a spurious verse by some scholars?
-Some scholars consider Acts 8:37 to be a spurious verse because it does not appear in the majority of manuscripts and was possibly added by a scribe's oversight.
What is the role of Erasmus in the creation of the King James Version of the Bible?
-Erasmus played a significant role in the creation of the New Testament part of the King James Version. His decisions, including the addition of certain verses, are discussed in the transcript.
What is the 'margin' mentioned in the transcript in relation to the Bible manuscripts?
-The 'margin' refers to the space around the main text in a manuscript where additional notes or comments could be written. The transcript suggests that a verse was added in the margin and later mistakenly included in the main text.
What does the transcript imply about the reliability of the King James Version?
-The transcript implies that the King James Version may not be entirely reliable due to the inclusion of verses that are not found in the original manuscripts.
What is the 'Latin Vulgate' mentioned in the transcript?
-The Latin Vulgate is an ancient Latin translation of the Bible. The transcript mentions that the verse in question is not found in the Latin Vulgate, suggesting it might be a later addition.
What does the transcript suggest people should do in response to these concerns about the King James Version?
-The transcript suggests that people should be cautious and not be misled by the King James Version's inaccuracies, implying that they should seek out more reliable translations or original texts.
What is the tone of the speaker in the transcript regarding the King James Version?
-The speaker in the transcript appears to be critical and concerned about the integrity of the King James Version, warning against its potential inaccuracies.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
How the Trinity verse got added to the Bible
The DISASTEROUS Imperfect Preservation Of The Quran [Debate] | Sam Shamoun
This Verse ALONE Disproves Islam
ORIGENS DA BÍBLIA: Descubra quem inventou os livros bíblicos.
A história do cristianismo só faz sentido se for verdadeira
Quran FAIL: How Islam's Holy Book DISPROVES Itself
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)