Honda CR-V или Toyota RAV4 - сравнение, ЧТО ЛУЧШЕ ?

Malkin Drive

3 Aug 201717:08

Summary

TLDRIn this video script, hosts Игорь and Малки compare two compact SUV rivals, the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V. They discuss design, practicality, and performance, highlighting each vehicle's strengths and weaknesses. The RAV4 is praised for its neutral design and active lifestyle suitability, while the CR-V is noted for its more masculine appearance and better fuel economy. Both vehicles offer different advantages, making the choice between them a matter of personal preference.

Takeaways

🚗 The script is a comparative analysis of two compact SUV rivals, the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V.
🎨 The Toyota RAV4 is described as a neutral, unisex design that doesn't evoke strong negative or positive emotions and is considered a practical choice for active leisure.
🌟 Honda CR-V is praised for its design details, such as chrome handles and molded门槛, which are considered more refined than those of the RAV4.
🔋 Both vehicles have similar engine performance with 2-liter engines, but the RAV4 has a slight edge with 150 horsepower compared to CR-V's 140 horsepower.
🛠️ Honda CR-V features a 5-speed automatic transmission, while Toyota RAV4 has a 4-speed automatic, which is seen as more reliable but less advanced.
🌿 The RAV4 is noted for its practicality, with simple handles and mirrors that are easy to replace, and no fancy moldings that could break.
💺 Both vehicles offer comfortable seating, but the RAV4 provides more legroom and a slightly larger cargo space of 586 liters compared to the CR-V's 556 liters.
🔄 The script highlights the CR-V's 5-step automatic transmission as being more fuel-efficient, with a real-world fuel consumption about 1 liter less than the RAV4.
🎚️ The CR-V is considered to have a smoother ride and better sound insulation, providing a more comfortable driving experience.
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Both vehicles are suitable for families, but the RAV4 might be more appealing for larger families due to the availability of a 7-seater variant.

Q & A

Which two compact crossovers are being compared in the script?
-The script compares the Toyota RAV4 and the Honda CR-V.
What is the opinion about the design of the Honda CR-V?
-The script suggests that the Honda CR-V has a design with many interesting details that are well-worked out, such as chrome handles and molded door sills.
What is the perception of the Toyota RAV4's design?
-The Toyota RAV4 is described as a neutral design that doesn't evoke strong negative or positive emotions and is suitable for everyone, being unisex.
What is the ground clearance of the Honda CR-V mentioned in the script?
-The ground clearance of the Honda CR-V is 185 millimeters, which is slightly lower than that of the Toyota RAV4.
What is the advantage of the Toyota RAV4's design for active rest?
-The Toyota RAV4's design is said to be convenient for active rest, with simple handles and mirrors that are easy to replace if broken.
What is the difference in rear legroom between the Honda CR-V and the Toyota RAV4?
-The script mentions that the Honda CR-V has 6 millimeters more rear legroom than the Toyota RAV4.
What is the luggage capacity of the Honda CR-V?
-The luggage capacity of the Honda CR-V is 556 liters, which is 30 liters less than the Toyota RAV4.
What seating configuration does the Toyota RAV4 offer that the Honda CR-V does not?
-The Toyota RAV4 offers a 7-seater variant, which is not available with the Honda CR-V.
How does the Honda CR-V's fuel consumption compare to the Toyota RAV4's?
-The Honda CR-V has a fuel consumption of 10 liters per 100 km, which is almost 1 liter less than the Toyota RAV4's 11.6 liters per 100 km.
What is the difference in the number of gears between the automatic transmissions of the two cars?
-The Honda CR-V has a 5-speed automatic transmission, while the Toyota RAV4 has a 4-speed automatic transmission.
What is the opinion on the driving experience of the Honda CR-V compared to the Toyota RAV4?
-The script suggests that the Honda CR-V has a smoother ride and better sound insulation than the Toyota RAV4.

Outlines

00:00

🚗 Car Comparison: Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V

The paragraph introduces a comparative analysis of two compact SUV rivals, the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V. The hosts, Igor and Vladimir, discuss the design and practicality aspects of both vehicles. They note that the RAV4 has a neutral design that appeals to a wide audience, while the CR-V has more distinctive features. The discussion highlights the CR-V's design details, such as chrome handles and molded门槛, which are more refined than those of the RAV4. The RAV4 is praised for its simplicity and robustness, making it suitable for active leisure. The hosts also touch on the clearance height of the vehicles, with the RAV4 having a slightly higher clearance than the CR-V, which is noted as a minor advantage for the RAV4.

05:00

🛋️ Interior and Practicality Discussion

This section delves into the interior comfort and practicality of both vehicles. The hosts compare the rear seat space and luggage capacity, noting that the RAV4 offers slightly more luggage space than the CR-V. They discuss the convenience of the rear seats, such as the ability to recline and the presence of cup holders. The paragraph also mentions the materials used in the interiors, with the CR-V having leather seats but no ventilation, while the RAV4 has simpler seats. The hosts appreciate the RAV4's straightforward and practical design, whereas the CR-V offers more luxurious touches but with some design quirks, like an unnecessary hole in the luggage compartment.

10:01

🏎️ Performance and Engine Specifications

The hosts compare the performance aspects of the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V. They discuss the engine options available, focusing on the 2.0-liter and 2.4-liter engines. The RAV4 is noted to have a 2.5-liter engine option that provides more power than the CR-V's 2.0-liter engine. The discussion highlights the RAV4's faster acceleration compared to the CR-V. However, the CR-V is praised for its 5-speed automatic transmission, which is considered an advantage over the RAV4's 4-speed transmission. The paragraph also addresses fuel consumption, with the CR-V being more fuel-efficient than the RAV4. Additionally, the hosts mention the seating capacity, with the RAV4 offering a 7-seater option, which is seen as a significant advantage for families.

15:03

🔧 Driving Experience and Conclusion

In this part, the hosts share their driving experiences with both vehicles. They discuss the ride comfort and handling, with the CR-V providing a smoother and quieter ride than the RAV4. The RAV4 is described as slightly stiffer and noisier. The hosts also touch on the design elements inside the vehicles, noting that the CR-V feels more modern despite its age, while the RAV4 has a more Spartan feel. The paragraph concludes with the hosts summarizing the comparison and inviting viewers to decide which vehicle they prefer based on their needs. They encourage viewers to subscribe to their channel and share their opinions in the comments.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Toyota RAV4

The Toyota RAV4 is a compact crossover SUV produced by Toyota. In the script, it is one of the two main vehicles being compared. The RAV4 is described as a 'neutral' car that doesn't evoke strong negative or positive emotions, making it a versatile choice for various users. It is also mentioned to have a simple design that doesn't stand out but is practical for active rest and family use.

💡Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V is another compact crossover SUV and a competitor to the Toyota RAV4. The script compares it with the RAV4, highlighting its design elements, performance, and features. It is noted for having more 'aggressive' lines and 'interesting details' in its design, which might appeal more to those who find the RAV4's design too plain.

💡Design

Design is a central theme in the script, as it refers to the visual appearance and aesthetics of the cars. The comparison between the RAV4 and the CR-V's design is made, with the RAV4 being described as more 'neutral' and the CR-V as having more 'aggressive' and 'interesting' design features, such as chrome handles and molded门槛.

💡Clearance

Clearance in the context of the script refers to the distance between the vehicle's underside and the ground, which is important for off-road capabilities. The script mentions that the Honda CR-V has a slightly lower clearance than the Toyota RAV4, but it is noted that this is not a significant drawback for a family car.

💡Practicality

Practicality is a key concept in the script, emphasizing the usability and convenience of the cars' features. The RAV4 is praised for its practicality, such as easy-to-replace parts and a simple design that is convenient for active use, whereas the CR-V is noted for its more sophisticated design elements that might be less practical but more visually appealing.

💡Engine

The engine is a critical component of any vehicle, and the script compares the engines of the RAV4 and CR-V. It mentions that the RAV4 with a 2.0-liter engine has 150 horsepower, which is more powerful than the CR-V's 2.0-liter engine with 140 horsepower. This difference in power is noted to affect the vehicles' acceleration and performance.

💡Transmission

Transmission refers to the system that transfers power from the engine to the wheels. The script points out that the CR-V has a 5-speed automatic transmission, while the RAV4 has a 4-speed automatic. The 5-speed transmission in the CR-V is considered more modern and potentially more efficient.

💡Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption is an important factor for car buyers, especially for family vehicles. The script mentions that the CR-V has slightly better fuel efficiency than the RAV4, with the RAV4 consuming about 1 liter more fuel per 100 kilometers in mixed driving conditions.

💡Ride Quality

Ride quality pertains to the comfort and smoothness of a vehicle's ride. The script suggests that the CR-V has a smoother ride and better shock absorption than the RAV4, which is described as being slightly 'stiffer' and having a more 'Spartan' feel.

💡Noise Isolation

Noise isolation refers to how well a vehicle shields its occupants from external noise. The script notes that the CR-V has better noise isolation, making it quieter inside the cabin compared to the RAV4, which is an important consideration for comfort during long drives.

💡Seven-seater

A seven-seater vehicle has the capacity to seat seven passengers. The script mentions that the RAV4 offers a seven-seater option, which is a significant advantage for families needing more seating. This feature is not available in the CR-V, making the RAV4 more suitable for larger families.

Highlights

Comparison between Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V, two direct competitors in the compact SUV segment.

The Toyota RAV4 is described as a neutral, unisex vehicle that doesn't evoke strong negative or positive emotions.

Honda CR-V has a more aggressive design with interesting details that make it visually appealing.

The clearance height of Honda CR-V is slightly lower than that of Toyota RAV4.

Honda CR-V has a simpler design in terms of exterior details, which makes it more practical for active rest.

The interior of Toyota RAV4 is praised for its simplicity and practicality.

Honda CR-V offers a slightly higher ground clearance and a larger rear overhang, which might be beneficial for practical use.

Both vehicles come with a comprehensive set of features, including hands-free access and a road vision system.

The wheel size on the Honda CR-V is larger, which might affect the ride comfort and cost of tires.

The trunk volume of Toyota RAV4 is slightly larger than that of Honda CR-V, offering more space for luggage.

Honda CR-V has a 5-speed automatic transmission, while Toyota RAV4 has a 4-speed automatic, which might affect fuel efficiency.

The fuel consumption of Honda CR-V is slightly lower than that of Toyota RAV4 in mixed driving conditions.

Toyota RAV4 offers a 7-seater variant, which is a significant advantage for families requiring more space.

The driving experience of Honda CR-V is described as smoother and softer compared to Toyota RAV4.

Honda CR-V has better sound insulation, providing a quieter ride.

Both vehicles have their own set of pros and cons, and the choice between them depends on personal preferences.

The reviewer invites viewers to subscribe to the channel, like the video, and share their opinions on which car they would choose and why.