¿Qué dice Danaher sobre los drills? ¿Cuánto hay que drillear?

Summary

In an interview with Lex Friedman from May 2021, Danager emphasizes the importance of a deeper understanding of drills in training. He argues against the common practice of mindlessly repeating movements and instead advocates for drills that build new skills or improve existing ones. Danager stresses the need for coaches to focus on teaching mechanics and feelings, gradually increasing resistance to mimic real-world scenarios. He also discusses the balance between rolling and drilling, suggesting that the ratio depends on the individual but generally leans towards more time spent on drilling. The video encourages viewers to listen to the full interview for a comprehensive understanding of his approach to training.

Takeaways

• 😀 Danager believes that the term 'drill' is often misused and lacks a deeper understanding of its purpose.
• 🏋️‍♂️ According to Danager, drills should be designed to improve existing skills or build new ones, not just be repeated for the sake of repetition.
• 🧠 Danager emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanics and 'feelings' of a movement, rather than focusing on the number of repetitions.
• 📈 He suggests that coaches should guide their students to acquire new knowledge and skills, rather than just setting high repetition targets.
• 🔧 Danager points out that drills should be practical and focused on solving specific problems, rather than being a random selection of movements.
• 💡 The coach's role, as Danager sees it, is to transmit knowledge and construct a program that starts with understanding and ends with refining specific skills.
• 🚀 Danager mentions the importance of gradually increasing resistance in training, similar to how a bodybuilder would not start with extremely heavy weights.
• 🔄 He advises that if a student is not progressing or is bored with their training, it might be time to change tactics or vary the exercises.
• 🤼‍♂️ Danager differentiates between 'rolling' and 'drilling', noting that rolling involves resistance, while drilling is more cooperative.
• ⏱️ He suggests that the time spent on drilling versus rolling should depend on the individual, but in a typical 2.5-hour class, 1.5 hours might be dedicated to drilling.
• 🔗 The video transcript is based on an interview with Danager by Lex Friedman in May 2021, and the speaker recommends listening to the full interview for more insights.

Q & A

What does Danager believe is the standard definition of drilling in the context of martial arts training?

According to Danager, the standard definition of drilling is selecting a movement in the academy and repeating it a certain number of times with the intention of improving one's technique.

Why does Danager argue that the standard definition of drilling is incorrect?

Danager argues that the standard definition is incorrect because it lacks a deeper understanding of what it means to drill. He believes that any movement in the gym that does not improve existing skills or build new ones is a waste.

What is the main purpose of training according to Danager's perspective?

The main purpose of training, according to Danager, is to improve oneself. Every activity in training should have the purpose of making the individual better, not just repeating a technique without understanding its mechanics.

Why does Danager advise against focusing on the number of repetitions during drills?

Danager advises against focusing on the number of repetitions because it can lead to a preoccupation with volume rather than skill acquisition. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanics and the purpose behind each drill.

What does Danager suggest should be the focus during drills instead of counting repetitions?

Danager suggests that the focus should be on mechanics and 'feelings' during drills, meaning that practitioners should concentrate on understanding the movements and how they feel rather than just counting repetitions.

How does Danager differentiate between knowledge and skill in the context of training?

Danager differentiates between knowledge and skill by stating that knowledge is the first step to building skill. Knowledge is understanding what needs to be learned, while skill is the practical application of that knowledge.

What is Danager's approach to coaching when it comes to drills?

Danager's approach to coaching involves giving drills that emphasize understanding the problems being solved and how to solve them practically. He does not assign numbers to his students but rather focuses on teaching mechanics and the purpose of each drill.

Why is it important to gradually increase resistance in training according to Danager?

Gradually increasing resistance is important because it mimics the real-world scenario where there is always resistance. It allows the practitioner to progress from 0 to 100% resistance over time, similar to how a bodybuilder would increase weight gradually.

What is the difference between rolling and drilling according to the transcript?

Rolling involves resistance and is a cooperative practice where both parties put in their effort to practice a movement. Drilling, on the other hand, is more focused on mechanics and understanding without necessarily involving resistance.

How should one decide when to change tactics in training according to Danager?

One should consider changing tactics when they feel they are no longer progressing or are tired of doing the same thing repeatedly. It might be time to switch to practicing different techniques or positions to continue improving.

What is Danager's recommendation for the time allocation between drilling and rolling in a class setting?

Danager suggests that in a two-and-a-half-hour class, one-and-a-half hours should be dedicated to drilling and the remaining hour to rolling, although this can vary depending on the individual.