Novas imagens mostram GCM atirando em adolescente rendido após perseguição em Cotia (SP) #g1

Summary

Two civil guards from Cotia, São Paulo, were arrested for the fatal shooting of a 17-year-old boy, Mateus Leandro da Silva. Initially, the guards' account of the incident was found to be inconsistent after investigators reviewed security footage showing them fleeing from a police car, followed by the teenager's death. Despite their claim of self-defense, evidence suggests Mateus was unarmed and surrendered before being shot. The guards’ actions, alongside discrepancies in their statements, have led to public outcry, with authorities emphasizing transparency and the rule of law in the investigation.

Takeaways

• 😀 Two civil guards from Cotia, Greater São Paulo, were arrested for the killing of a 17-year-old boy, Mateus Leandro da Silva.
• 😀 The guards, José Osmar Ferreira da Silva and Sérgio Ricardo Barbosa Pimenta da Silva, initially provided a false version of events.
• 😀 Security camera footage contradicted the guards' statements, showing them fleeing from a police vehicle and one of them shooting at the teenager.
• 😀 The footage also revealed that the teenager was shot while attempting to flee, without any weapon on him.
• 😀 The guards first claimed the shooting occurred during a gunfight after a car crash, but no video evidence supported this account.
• 😀 In their revised testimony, the guards admitted one of them shot at Mateus after he allegedly turned sharply toward the vehicle.
• 😀 The guards stated that Mateus was asked if he had a weapon, to which he reportedly responded 'no.'
• 😀 Police authorities emphasized that while officers have the right to defend themselves, lying about the incident and killing a surrendered individual is unjustifiable.
• 😀 The Cotia city government confirmed the guards were performing their duties when the incident occurred but have since been removed from operational duties.
• 😀 The Public Security Department of Cotia pledged transparency and adherence to the law in their investigation into the incident.

Q & A

What was the incident involving the two civil guards from Cotia?

The two civil guards from Cotia were arrested for killing a 17-year-old boy, Mateus Leandro da Silva, over the weekend. The guards lied in their statements regarding the incident, and after an investigation, their arrest was converted into preventive detention.

What led the delegate to be suspicious of the guards' statements?

The delegate was suspicious of the guards' statements after investigators discovered security camera footage showing the guards fleeing from a police cruiser and one of them shooting at the teenager, who was unarmed and lying on the ground.

What did the security camera footage reveal about the incident?

The security camera footage showed the two guards fleeing on foot from a police vehicle, with one of the guards shooting at Mateus as he ran away. The young man fell to the ground after being shot twice in the chest, and no weapon was found on him.

What did the guards initially claim about the incident?

The guards initially claimed that the incident began when they saw an armed duo getting out of a car and approaching the driver of another vehicle. They stated that a chase ensued, during which the young man crashed the car into a pole, and an exchange of gunfire began.

How did the guards change their story during the investigation?

In their latest statement, the guards admitted that one of them, José Osmar Ferreira, shot once at Mateus after the teenager allegedly turned sharply towards the vehicle. The guard also claimed he asked Mateus if he was armed, to which Mateus reportedly replied he was not.

What evidence contradicts the guards' version of events?

The evidence that contradicts the guards' version includes the security camera footage showing Mateus being shot while running, unarmed, and without any confrontation. Additionally, the police found no weapon on the teenager, and the scene was not preserved by the guards.

What did the Cotia city government say about the guards' actions?

The Cotia city government stated that the guards were preventively removed from their operational duties but were carrying out their duties as public security agents when the incident began. They also emphasized their commitment to transparency and respect for the law.

How did the guards' behavior escalate the situation?

The guards' actions escalated the situation by shooting the teenager without any evidence of him being armed or posing a threat. Their decision to lie in their statements and flee the scene after the shooting further compounded the seriousness of their actions.

What is the significance of the statement regarding security agents defending themselves?

The statement emphasizes that while security agents have the right to defend themselves, they are held accountable if they lie and kill an individual who has surrendered. This is a critical point as it draws attention to the guards' criminal behavior in this case.

What do the authorities hope to convey through this investigation and the released footage?

The authorities aim to convey transparency and accountability, highlighting that the guards' actions were under scrutiny and that they will be held accountable for their actions, regardless of their role as public security agents.