I had 1 hour to beat the best AI plagiarism checker
TLDRIn an experiment to outsmart AI plagiarism detectors, the host challenges themselves to write a 500-word essay within an hour that evades the detection of GPT Zero, a cutting-edge plagiarism checker. Despite several attempts to add personality and originality, the essay repeatedly flags as plagiarized. The host expresses concerns about the potential misuse of these tools and their effectiveness in distinguishing between AI-generated and human-written content. Ultimately, the experiment reveals the limitations of current AI detection methods and the necessity for human input in creating authentic writing.
Takeaways
- ๐ The challenge was to write a 500-word essay within an hour that could bypass the latest plagiarism checker, GPT Zero.
- ๐ Students have been known to use AI like ChatGPT for writing papers, leading to the development of sophisticated detection tools.
- ๐ GPT Zero is highly regarded by educators and has been endorsed by numerous publications, claiming high accuracy in detecting AI plagiarism.
- ๐ค Initial attempts at writing an essay using ChatGPT resulted in a text flagged as plagiarized due to repetitive phrases and dry, robotic facts.
- ๐ To improve the essay, the writer focused on adding human-like elements such as weird metaphors, personality, and reducing repetition.
- ๐ After multiple revisions, the essay managed to pass GPT Zero and other AI detectors, indicating the possibility to bypass plagiarism checks.
- ๐ค The essay's creator expressed concerns about the potential for false accusations and the reliance on AI detectors in educational settings.
- ๐ The perplexity and burstiness metrics of real writing exceeded those of the AI-generated essay, suggesting different thresholds for detection.
- ๐ The infinite prompt generator was used to create an essay, but the results were unsatisfactory and required further refinement.
- ๐ Metaphors improved the essay's burstiness and perplexity scores, yet some sentences still flagged as plagiarized, showing the limitations of current AI writing.
- ๐ The writer concluded that while AI can assist in writing, significant human input is still required for quality and original content.
Q & A
What was the main challenge the speaker set for themselves?
-The main challenge was to generate a 500-word essay within one hour that could bypass the latest AI plagiarism checker, GPT Zero.
How does the speaker initially select the topic for the essay?
-The speaker randomly selects the topic for the essay, which turns out to be 'kangaroos'.
What are the three human-like qualities the speaker instructs Chat GPT to incorporate into the essay?
-The three qualities are weird metaphors, bright sun tone, and personability.
What issue did the speaker notice with the initial essay generated by Chat GPT?
-The initial essay was plagiarized, and Chat GPT tended to repeat the same words and phrases, making the facts sound dry and robotic.
How did the speaker attempt to bypass the AI plagiarism detector?
-The speaker made the essay more personable, less repetitive, and tackled individual offending sentences with more testing.
What was the speaker's concern about the feedback from AI detectors?
-The speaker was concerned that having feedback on exact plagiarized sentences beforehand might be a cheat and may not always be available.
What did the speaker find problematic about the perplexity and burstiness scores?
-The speaker found it problematic that the scores of real writing far exceeded the AI-generated paper, suggesting that universities might have a different detection threshold.
What was the result of the speaker's experiment with the infinite prompt generator?
-The result was unsatisfactory; the essay generated by the infinite prompt generator was horrible and only half an hour was left to improve it.
How did the speaker use metaphors to improve the essay's scores?
-By focusing more on metaphors and giving examples for the AI to follow, the burstiness and perplexity scores increased where the metaphors were used.
What was the speaker's final verdict on their challenge?
-The speaker failed the challenge as they could not generate an essay that passed the AI detectors completely.
How does the speaker use Chat GPT for their novel writing?
-The speaker uses Chat GPT by feeding it a specific plot, characters, and scene summaries paragraph by paragraph, which then outputs vivid, descriptive story-like paragraphs.
What is the speaker's hope regarding AI writing tools in universities?
-The speaker hopes that these tools won't turn into the polygraph test of the century, implying they don't want them to be misused or become unreliable.
Outlines
๐ The Challenge of Bypassing AI Plagiarism Detectors
The paragraph discusses the ongoing challenge of students attempting to use AI like Chat GPT to write essays and the development of detection tools such as GPT Zero. The author takes on the challenge of writing a 500-word essay on kangaroos that can bypass this advanced plagiarism checker. The essay initially gets flagged as plagiarized, but after adding human-like elements such as weird metaphors, bright sun tone, and personality, the essay manages to pass as human-written. However, the author expresses concerns about the limitations of such detectors, including the potential for false positives and the need for universities to establish clear thresholds for detection.
Mindmap
Keywords
Plagiarism Checker
Chat GPT
Perplexity
Burstiness
Personability
Time Travelers
Adderall
Infinite Prompt Generator
Metaphors
Open AI Detector
Polygraph Test
Highlights
The challenge is to generate a 500-word essay that can bypass the latest plagiarism checker, GPT Zero, within one hour.
GPT Zero is endorsed by numerous publications and educators, claiming to detect AI plagiarism accurately.
The metrics of perplexity and burstiness are used by GPT Zero to evaluate the likelihood of plagiarism.
The initial attempt using chat GPT to write an essay on kangaroos was flagged as plagiarized.
Adding human-like elements such as weird metaphors, personality, and reducing repetition improved the essay but it was still detected as plagiarized.
The essay needed to be more personable and less repetitive to mimic human writing.
Testing individual sentences to identify plagiarism led to a fully AI-written paper that appeared human on some detectors.
The challenge was not fully met as the exact sentences flagged for plagiarism were known in advance, which may not always be the case.
The perplexity and burstiness scores of real writing still exceeded the AI-generated paper.
Universities may have different detection thresholds than free online checkers.
An infinite prompt generator was used to create essays, but the results were not satisfactory.
Focusing on metaphors and providing examples for the AI to follow increased the burstiness and perplexity scores.
Despite efforts, some sentences still flagged as plagiarized, and no solution was found within the one-hour timeframe.
Open AI released their own detector that assesses if the writing was likely written by an AI, without relying on perplexity and burstiness metrics.
There is a concern that these plagiarism detection tools may become as controversial as the polygraph test.
The author is currently writing a novel with the help of chat GPT, using a prompt with a specific plot, characters, and scene summaries.
Human input is still required for quality essay writing, even when using AI assistance.