Ai ART: I'm angry at artists

Ethan Becker
21 Dec 202204:26

TLDRThe video script discusses the impact of AI-generated art on the art community. It starts with the passing of a renowned artist and the subsequent recreation of his work by an AI artist, which has sparked controversy and anger among artists. The speaker expresses frustration with artists feeling threatened by AI and encourages them to embrace the change. The community's response to AI art includes fighting against art scraping, passing copyright laws, and boycotting AI art. The speaker then shifts to a more positive outlook, suggesting that the real value in art lies in the community and the connection between artists and their audience. They argue that the essence of art is not just the creation but the engagement it fosters. The video ends with a call to action for artists to create meaningful art that fills a void in people's hearts, using the current situation as an opportunity to innovate and connect with their audience on a deeper level.


  • 😡 The speaker expresses frustration over AI recreating artworks of deceased artists like Kim Jong-gi and monetizing them, viewing it as unethical.
  • 💰 The narrative shifts to discuss the potential of generating income through AI art, hinting at the ease and legality of monetizing AI-generated artworks.
  • 🎨 The speaker identifies as an artist and shares a personal artwork, emphasizing a deep connection and appreciation for art beyond just AI creations.
  • 👥 A friend of the speaker, Sam Desartes, is mentioned as a victim of art theft, which compounds the speaker’s anger towards art scraping and exploitation.
  • 🚫 The community's response includes efforts like advocating for copyright laws and boycotting AI art on platforms like Art Station to protect original artworks.
  • 🤔 The rise of AI prompts the speaker to introspect about the fundamental reasons for being an artist and the true value of art to society.
  • 👀 The speaker shifts perspective to view the controversy around AI as a catalyst that unifies artists and amplifies community engagement.
  • 🌐 The emphasis is placed on the community and interaction within art, with 'Project City' highlighted as a hub for active learning and professional dialogue.
  • 🎁 Promotion of Project City's art classes suggests using community and professional feedback as crucial learning tools for artists.
  • 🌟 The speaker concludes with an optimistic outlook, suggesting that the adversity faced by artists due to AI can lead to stronger community bonds and innovation in art.

Q & A

  • Why is the speaker angry at other artists in the video?

    -The speaker is angry because an AI artist recreated all of Kim Jong-Gi's art and profited from it after his death. This sparked a broader concern about AI's impact on traditional artists and their livelihoods.

  • What specific event triggered the speaker's reaction?

    -The trigger was the death of Kim Jong-Gi, a renowned artist, followed immediately by an AI recreating his artworks for profit, which the speaker viewed as disrespectful and exploitative.

  • How did the speaker respond to the situation?

    -Initially, the speaker was extremely critical and dismissive of traditional artists complaining about AI. However, their perspective shifted towards recognizing the value of human artists in creating meaningful connections through art.

  • What are the main concerns of the art community regarding AI, as mentioned in the script?

    -The art community is concerned about AI scraping their work, copyright issues, and the potential loss of originality and personal connection in art due to AI-generated pieces.

  • What actions did the art community take in response to AI-generated art?

    -The art community took several actions including boycotting AI art on platforms like Art Station, funding initiatives to pass copyright laws protecting artists, and collectively fighting against art scraping.

  • How does the speaker view the role of artists in the context of AI and art?

    -The speaker believes that the role of artists is to engage with the community through their art, emphasizing that personal connection and interaction are more important than the art itself.

  • What is Project City, and why does the speaker endorse it?

    -Project City is an art school that focuses on building a community and providing professional artist feedback. The speaker endorses it because it emphasizes the importance of community and interaction in the learning process.

  • How does the speaker suggest artists can find opportunities in the era of AI?

    -The speaker suggests that artists should embrace the community-focused aspects of their work, using AI as a tool to prompt deeper questions about their purpose and the impact of their art, thus finding new opportunities to create meaningful connections.

  • What shift in thinking does the speaker describe towards the end of the script?

    -Towards the end, the speaker shifts from being highly critical of other artists to a more reflective and community-oriented perspective, focusing on the collective strength and potential of artists working together.

  • What does the speaker imply about the future of artists in the age of AI?

    -The speaker implies that despite the challenges posed by AI, there is a significant opportunity for artists to redefine their roles and focus on the unique human aspects of art that AI cannot replicate, such as personal connection and emotional resonance.



🖼️ The Impact of AI on Art and Community Response

The narrative opens by discussing the unfortunate passing of Kim Jong-gi, a renowned artist, and the subsequent use of AI to recreate his artwork for profit. This leads into a broader discussion about generating income from AI-generated art. The narrator expresses personal involvement in the art world and mentions a friend who was negatively impacted by someone profiting off their art. The situation escalates into a critique of artists who complain about AI surpassing their abilities, suggesting they should adapt instead. The tone shifts towards community action, highlighting how artists united to fight against art scraping and push for copyright protection. The paragraph concludes on a contemplative note, questioning the fundamental reasons for creating art and its consumption, emphasizing that community and personal engagement are more vital than the artwork itself.



💡AI Art

AI Art refers to artwork created with the assistance of artificial intelligence technologies. In the video, the speaker expresses frustration over AI reproducing the works of famous artists, such as Kim Jong-Gi, and potentially generating income from these reproductions. This highlights a tension between traditional art forms and new AI-driven creations, which is a central theme of the discussion.

💡Art scraping

Art scraping involves the unauthorized collection of artists' works, typically through digital means, to use in creating new content or for commercial gain without permission. The video's speaker discusses the community's response to art scraping, including efforts to pass copyright laws and boycott platforms that allow or promote such practices, emphasizing the threat it poses to artists' rights and livelihoods.

💡Copyright laws

Copyright laws are designed to protect creators' original works from unauthorized use, ensuring they can control and benefit from their creations. In the video, there is a call to action for strengthening copyright laws as a countermeasure against art scraping and unauthorized use of AI to replicate artists' works, highlighting the legal aspects of artistic creation in the digital age.


The term 'community' in the video refers to the collective of artists and art enthusiasts who interact, share, and support each other. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the community in responding to challenges posed by AI in the art world, such as organizing and advocating for artists' rights and fostering a supportive environment.

💡Professional artist feedback

Professional artist feedback involves critiques and guidance provided by experienced artists to learners or peers. The video mentions this as a valuable component of art education platforms like Project City, illustrating its role in artistic development and community building within educational settings.

💡Art school

Art school is referenced in the context of Project City, which is described as a hub for learning and community engagement. The video suggests that art schools and educational programs are crucial for nurturing artists and helping them navigate the evolving landscape of art influenced by technological advancements like AI.

💡AI impact

AI impact in the video is discussed in terms of its effect on traditional art and artists. The speaker initially expresses anger towards AI surpassing human artists in some aspects but later sees the integration of AI as a catalyst that forces artists to ask profound questions about their roles and the essence of art, indicating a complex relationship between technology and artistic expression.


Creativity in this context refers to the ability of artists to produce original and meaningful artwork. The video challenges artists to harness their creativity not just to create art but to engage meaningfully with their communities and adapt to the opportunities presented by AI, portraying creativity as a dynamic and crucial skill in the face of technological change.

💡Copyright art laws

The term 'copyright art laws' specifically refers to legal measures that protect artists' intellectual property against unauthorized reproduction and use. The video highlights efforts to strengthen these laws as a defense against the exploitation of artists' work, particularly in the digital and AI realms.

💡Art consumption

Art consumption is touched upon in the video as the speaker contemplates why people engage with art and what drives them to appreciate it. This reflection is spurred by the upheaval AI has brought to the art world, prompting a deeper inquiry into the value and impact of art in society.


Kim Jong-gi, a renowned artist, recently passed away, and an AI artist recreated his work, potentially profiting from it.

The speaker discusses generating money with AI art, which was generated by an outsourcer.

The speaker is an artist and shares a personal painting, expressing a love for art.

The issue of someone ripping off the artist Sam and profiting from it is mentioned.

There's a debate about AI being superior to human artists and the speaker's frustration with this notion.

Artists are feeling threatened by AI and its impact on their work.

The art community is rallying against art scraping and advocating for copyright laws.

The speaker suggests that the real value lies in the community and interaction around art, not the art itself.

Sam Sam is highlighted as an example of an artist whose personal appeal may be as significant as their art.

The speaker expresses excitement about the future of art in the context of AI and asks fundamental questions about the purpose of art.

Project City art school is mentioned as a place for community, professional feedback, and dialogue.

The importance of an active community in learning and growing as an artist is emphasized.

The speaker offers a perspective that AI's emergence has brought artists together in a meaningful way.

There's a call to action for artists to be creative and to fill the void in people's hearts with meaningful art.

The potential negative impact of AI on the art world is acknowledged, but the speaker tries to focus on the positive aspects.

Artists are encouraged to see the opportunity in the current situation and to engage with their community.

The speaker contemplates whether the AI art controversy could either strengthen the art community or lead to its downfall.